Global Environment

Global Environment.com

Biodiversity   pattern

Wild Species

Why preserve wild species?

If all species eventually become extinct, why should we worry about losing a few mo because of our activities. Does it not matter that the passenger pigeon, the black rhinoceros, the northern spotted owl, the green sea turtle, the 70 remaining Florida panthers, or some unknown plant or insect in a tropical forest becomes prematurely extinct because of human activities?

 
 
 
Florida Panther
Florida Panther
Green Sea Turtle
Green Sea Turtle
Northern Spotted Owl
Northern Spotted Owl
 


Biologists contend that the answer is yes because of the economic, medical, scientific, ecological, aesthetic, and recreational value of all species. Some environmental scientists go further and contend that each species has an inherent right to play its role in the ongoing evolution of life on earth until it becomes extinct without interference by humans.

Economical and Medical Importance of Wild Species

Some 90% of today's food crops were domesticated from wild tropical plants. Moreover, agricultural scientists and genetic engineers need existing wild plant species to derive today's crop strains and to develop the new crop strains of tomorrow.

Wild plants and plants domesticated from wild species supply rubber, oils, dyes, paper, lumber, and other useful products. Nitrogen-fixing microbes in the soil and in the plants' root nodules supply nitrogen to grow food crops. pollination by birds and insects is essential to many food crops.

About 80% of the world's population relies on plants or plant extracts for medicines. At least 405 of all pharmaceuticals owe their existence to genetic resources of wild plants, mostly from tropical developing countries. Plant-derived anticancer drugs save an estimated 30,000 lives per year in the United States. Over 3,000 antibiotics, including penicillin and tetracycline, are derived from micro-organisms.

Scientific and Ecological Importance

Every species can help scientists understand how life has evolved and functions, and how it will continue to evolve on this planet. Wild species also provide may of the ecological services that make up earth capital and thus are key factors in sustaining the earth's biodiversity and ecological integrity.

They supply us (and other species) with food, recycle nutrients essential to agriculture, and help generate and maintain soils. They also produce oxygen and other gases in the atmosphere, absorb pollution, moderate the earth's climate, help regulate local climates and water supplies, reduce erosion and flooding, and store solar energy. Moreover, they detoxify poisonous substances, break down organic wastes, control potential crop pests and disease carriers, and make up a vast gene pool for future evolutionary processes.

Aesthetic and Recreational Importance

Wild plants and animals are a source of beauty, wonder, joy, and recreational pleasure for many people.

Wildlife tourism, sometimes called ecotourism, is the fastest growing segment of the global travel industry.

Ethical Importance

Some people believe that each species has an inherent right to exist, or to struggle to exist. This ethical stance is based on the view that each species has intrinsic value unrelated to its usefulness to humans.

According to this view, we have an ethical responsibility to protect species from becoming prematurely extinct as a results of human activities.


Extinctions

Extinction is a natural process and eventually all species become extinct. Each year, a small number of species becomes extinct naturally at a low rate. Based mostly on fossil record, evolutionary biologists estimate that the current average natural rate of extinction is 3 species per year if there are about 10 million species. In contrast, mass extinction is an abrupt rise in extinction rates above the natural level. It is a catastrophic, often global event in which large groups of existing species (perhaps 25-70%) are wiped out. Most mass extinctions are believed to result from one or a combination of global climate changes that kill many species and leave behind those able to adapt to new conditions.

Conservationists believe that we are facing a new mass extinction, which is taking place in only a few decades, rather than over thousands to millions of years. Such rapid extinction cannot be balanced by speciation because it takes 2,000-100,000 generations for new species to evolve. Fossil and other evidence related to past extinctions indicates that it takes millions of years to recover biodiversity through adaptive radiations. Thus repercussions for humans and other species from the current human-caused mass extinction will affect the future course of evolution for 5-10 million years.

There are 86 documented mammal extinctions (1.8% of the total number of mammals) that have occurred over the past 400 years. Roughly, 23% of these extinctions have occurred in Australia and 23% in the West Indies. The greatest number of extinctions has been among the rodents and bats, 46 and 13 species respectively. Over the same time period there have been 104 documented bird extinctions (1% of the total number of birds), 20% of which occurred in Mauritius, 18% in the United States (mostly Hawaiian islands), and 14% in New Zealand. Other geopolitical units with large numbers of bird extinctions are Reunion, Australia, and French Polynesia. This list clearly demonstrates that the majority of bird extinctions have taken place on islands.

Factors that cause species extinctions

There are many reasons why animals become extinct:

1. Habitat Destruction is one of the most obvious forms of damage to ecosystems today. Coral reefs are subject to dynamite fishing in some parts of the world and other marine ecosystems suffer from substrate damage done by boat anchorages. Deforestation is a key form of destruction brought about by logging, clearing for farming and habitat destruction that occurs slowly, bit by bit. Singapore in Southeast Asia has had 95% of its native lowland rainforests cleared after extensive deforestation. As many as 26 forest bird species became extinct between 1923-1949 and 35 forest species disappeared between 1949-1998.

2. Fragmentation is a form of habitat destruction in that much of the original habitat gets removed or modified, leaving patches of the remaining habitat. Even though these patches may initially have most of the species that were once there, the diversity will degenerate. This is usually because life cycles of plants and animals are so disrupted that many species simply die out over time. Many animals do not like crossing open or bare ground from one patch to another, so they remain isolated in an island of habitat, which is vulnerable to further damage.

3. Introduced species create major problems. This form of destruction happens without direct human interference, once the introduced species is released. Yet, the effects can be devastating. Introduced species create major problems in the following ways:

*They can become predators and kill native species so quickly and thoroughly that the native species becomes extinct.

* They can breed out of control, without natural checks and balances. In this way, the introduced species eat far more than the native vegetation can support. Since vegetation is usually the basis for an ecosystem food chain, if that gets destroyed, the rest of the food chain will most likely collapse.

*Introduced species can compete for space, nutrition and mineral resources. In severe cases, an introduced species will push out the native species over time, resulting in significant changes in the ecosystem as a whole. E.g. On islands in the Gulf of California, many species and subspecies of rodents are relict species, restricted to the islands, and are now considered extinct or verging on extinction. Five native taxa are now considered extinct (e.g. Neotoma bunkeri). The most probable cause for extinction was the introduction of non-native species, specifically cats.

4. Over harvesting refers to the catching of wild populations of animals, which are left to their own devices to recover their numbers. In the marine environment, vast numbers of fish and marine animals are harvested every year. Little or no effort is put into assisting their increase after harvesting, and the populations get smaller each year and risk extinction.

5. Local forms of pollution
may be absorbed by a large healthy ecosystem. Excessive release of chemicals over extended time periods will poison forests and render lakes almost sterile. Liquid chemical pollution can destroy the biological fabric of river systems. Pollution also has a tendency to spread out ever further and find its way into food chains


Human impacts on the environment, such as habitat loss and pollution, do not threaten all groups of species equally. At greatest risk are species with small population sizes, species whose populations vary greatly and species with slow rates of population growth. More specifically, the following groups of organisms are particularly susceptible to extinction:

Species at higher trophic levels tend to be large, rare animals with slow rates of population growth. They are particularly susceptible to over-exploitation or habitat loss, e.g. thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus, Tasmanian wolf).
Thylacines became extinct in Australia because of the introduction of dingoes. When the Europeans arrived, thylacines were seen as a direct threat to the sheep introduced to the rich grazing lands. Thylacine habitat coincided with the best farming areas. From 1830 a bounty was offered for the scalp of each thylacine. The thylacine was seen as a particular threat to its wool industry. Before European arrival, thylacines most probably hunted kangaroos and wallabies, which were pursued relentlessly until they fell, exhausted. Sheep, introduced by the Europeans, were much easier targets.

Local endemics; species with restricted ranges are often threatened by habitat loss. Water development, pollution, or habitat alteration could easily drive the species to extinction. The extremely high rate of island species extinction further testifies to the threat that local endemics face. E.g. The Dusky Seaside Sparrow, Ammodramus maritimus nigrescens, became extinct in 1987. It lived on the east coast of Florida and depended on moist cordgrass Spartina bakerii habitat for nesting sites. The decline and disappearance of the dusky seaside sparrow is due entirely to the loss of its habitat. The sparrow's cordgrass habitat could only grow in a very narrow range of moisture conditions. When one habitat area was flooded and the other drained as a result of development, there was nowhere for the dusky seaside sparrow to live. If the dusky seaside sparrow had not had such specialized habitat needs, it would not have become extinct.

Species with small populations; many species at higher trophic levels have sparsely distributed populations; habitat restriction or fragmentation may reduce their populations to very small levels. However, the population sizes of species at lower trophic levels may also be extremely small in a given habitat or region.

Largest members of a guild; whether or not a species is on the top trophic level, large species have high metabolic demands, require large habitats, and tend to occur in low densities. Thus, the largest species within a group of species sharing similar food sources (a guild) tend to be a high risk of extinction. E.g. all of the lemurs that have died out since Madagascar was colonized by human beings were as large or larger than the surviving species.

Species with poor dispersal and colonization ability; as with local endemics, species with narrow habitat requirements and species that can't disperse easily to new habitats are at high risk of extinction, even if their population is widespread. For example, in the face of a warming climate, some of the most threatened species will be those that can't disperse as fast as suitable habitat moves to higher elevations and latitudes.

Species with colonial nesting habits; colonial nesting species are particularly susceptible to over-exploitation or the loss of breeding habitat, the vulnerability of the extinct passenger pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius) to hunters was increased by the birds' tendency to nest in enormous colonies. The Passenger Pigeon became extinct in central and eastern North America by 1914.

Migratory species depend upon suitable habitat in their summer and winter range and along the course of their migratory route. Thus, the potential for adverse effects of habitat changes on migrant populations is high.
Species with specialised feeding habits; these species' populations fluctuate greatly, so they face increased threats of extinction when their population is low. E.g. The Giant Panda only eats Bamboo. If that food source disappears then the species will decline to extinction.

Species with little evolutionary experience with disturbances; in regions where human beings have a longstanding presence, the species most sensitive to human disturbance have already been lost and many of the remaining species have adapted to the additional disturbance. In contrast, species are extremely vulnerable where human disturbance has no historical precedent. Thus, the loss of the passenger pigeon was related to the introduction of a predator where none had existed before or to the introduction of a predator with a new means of hunting e.g. the rifle, which the prey had not previously experienced.

Behavioral patterns; if one Carolina parakeet is shot dead the rest of the flock hover over the dead body, leaving them vulnerable to predators. The key Deer forages for cigarette butts along highways – it’s a “nicotine addict”, this leaves it vulnerable to predators and the chance of being hit by a passing car.


Solutions: Protecting Wild Species From Depletion and Extinction

How Can We Protect Wildlife and Biodiversity?

There are three basic approaches to managing wildlife and protecting biodiversity. The ecosystem approach aims to preserve balanced populations of species in their native habitats, establish legally protected wilderness ares and wildlife reserves, and eliminate or reduce the populations of non-native species.

Biologists consider protecting ecosystems to be the best way to preserve biological diversity and ecological integrity. The basic problem is that fully or partially protected wildlife sanctuaries make up only 6% of the world's land area, and the human population is expected to double in the next 40 years.

The species approach is based on protecting endangered species by identifying them, giving them legal protection, preserving and managing their crucial habitats, propagating them in captivity, and reintroducing them into sustainable habitats. The wildlife management approach manages game species for sustained yield by using laws to regulate hunting, establish harvest quotas, developing population management plans, and using international treaties to protect migrating game species such as waterfowl.

 
 
 

Top up arrow

 
 

Top up arrow

 
 

e-mail me Site Map